审判前的辩护：计划、分析与策略Pretrial Advocacy: Planning, Analysis, and Strategy

Acknowledgments
Introduction
A. INTRODUCTION
B. THE LAWYER'S WORLD
1. Human Relationships
2. Resource Constraints
3. Ethical Responsibilities
4. A System "Moving in Time"
a. A Civil Case
b. A Criminal Case
C. THE APPROACH
1. An Introduction
a. Objectives
(1) Client's Objectives and the Representational Strategy
(2) Case Theory
(3) Specific Objectives of Performance Skills
(4) Basic Task
b. Planning
2. Rationale Behind the Approach
a. Anticipate Problems and Responses
b. Adopt a Goal-Oriented Approach
c. Form an Integrated Plan
d. Achieve Competence
3. Articulation of the Approach
a. The Plan for Litigation
b. Content Planning
Question 1. What information do I want to present in this skills performance (i.e., direct examination)? Why, in terms of my case theory?
Question 2. What problems can I anticipate from my opponent?
Question 3. How will I deal with these potential problems?
c. Performance Planning
Problem 1. The Role of an Attorney in the Adversary System
II Case Theory
A. INTRODUCTION
B. OBJECTIVES
C. PREPARATION
D. DEVELOPING A CASE THEORY
1. The Legal Theory
a. Civil and Criminal Plaintiffs
b. Selecting and Developing Plaintiff's Legal Theory
c. Civil and Criminal Defendants
(1) Blunting the Attack: Finding Weaknesses in Plaintiff's Case Theory
(a) Legal Insufficiency
(b) Factual Insufficiency
(c) Persuasive Insufficiency
(d) Procedural Aspects
(2) Mounting a Counterattack: Raising an Affirmative Defense
d. Multiple Legal Theories
(1) Fact-Gathering
(2) Strategic Sequence
(3) Alternatives
2. The Factual Theory
a. Civil and Criminal Plaintiffs
(1) A Story
(2) An Illustration: A Story About the Sale of a Cow
b. Civil and Criminal Defendants
3. The Relationship Between Legal and Factual Theory
4. Adversary Context of Case Theory
5. Relationship Between Case Theory and Pretrial Performance Skills
a. Targets Central Issues
b. Provides Context for Skills Performance
c. An Illustration
E. PLANNING QUESTIONS
CRIMINAL PROBLEMS: State v. Hard
Problem 2. Prosecutor: Initial Development of a Case Theory (Non-Fatal Assault)
Problem 3. Prosecutor: Initial Development of a Case Theory (Fatal Assault)
Problem 4. Defense Attorney: Initial Development of a Case Theory (Charge of Assault in the First Degree)
Problem 5. Defense Attorney: Initial Development of a Case Theory (Charge of Premeditated First-Degree Murder)
CIVIL PROBLEMS: Summers v. Hard
Problem 6. Plaintiffs' Attorney: Theorizing About Summers v. Hard
Problem 7. Attorney for Defendant Hard: Theorizing About Summers v. Hard
Problem 8. Attorney for Defendant Davola: Theorizing About Summers v. Hard
Problem 9. Attorneys for Defendants Hard and Davola: Meeting and Theorizing About Summers v. Hard
……
III Fact Investigation
IV Client Interviewing
V Witness Interviewing
VI Pleading
VII Discovery
VIII Pretrial Motions
IX Counseling
X Negotiation
XI Alternative Dispute Resolution
Pretrial Case Files