理想国:英文

理想国:英文 - 图书城

增改描述、封面图片

作者:
希腊柏拉图
ISBN:
9787560013633 , 7560013635
出版社:
出版日期:
1998-4-1
定价:
13.90
¥10.50元 76折 去当当网购买 免费配送!
¥10.50元 76折 去当当网购买 免费配送!
¥10.40元 75折 去卓越网购买
¥10.40元 75折 去卓越网购买
读过这本书吗?
最近在读 读过 想读 还不熟悉
我的评价:   
图书城书列:
加入到博客或社交网站:
我来评论这本书:
标题:
评价:
内容:
内容提要:
    《理想国》不同于早期对话之处,在于对话继续引向一些确定的结论。第二卷开始,柏拉图的哥格劳孔(Glaucon)参加对话,之后的对话主要在他与苏格拉底之间进行,柏拉图的另一位哥阿德曼图(Adeimantus)也偶尔插话。他们俩提出,正义的本质在灵魂之中,正义的好处或坏处在于对灵魂的影响,因此,不能只讨论正义的外在表现--法律,以及它的表面后果--受害而不义者常常得利。苏格拉底说,要认清个人灵魂中的正义,首先要从国家的正义谈起,正如大字比小字更容易辨认一样。
喜欢读"这本书"的人也喜欢:
作者简介:
    
编辑推荐:
    《理想国》是柏拉图最重要的代表作,不仅因为《理想国》内容全面、系统,更重要的是:这部著作最能体现柏拉图的创作意图,使读者能够从柏拉图的政治理想和当时希腊城邦的社会现实出发,理解柏拉图哲学思想的真实依据、现实针对性的历史意义。读者可以从中看到:柏拉图的哲学思辨和他的政治理想、社会经验、生活体验和爱憎情感密切地交织在一起。
目录:
Book One
Book Two
Book Three
Book Four
Book Five
Book Six
Book Seven
Book Eight
Book Nine
Book Ten
Analysis of the Republic
书摘:
书摘
Therefore, whenever anything pulls back a soul that is under the influence of thirst, it will be something in the soul distinct from the principle which thirsts, and which drives it like a beast to drink: for we hold it to be impossible that the same thing should, at the same time, with the same part of itself, in reference to the same object, be doing two opposite things.
Concerning the gods, then, I continued, such, as it would appear, is the language to be held, and such the language to be forbidden, in the hearing of all,from childhood upwards, who are hereafter to honour thegods and their parents, and to set no small value on mutual friedship.
Yes, he said; and I think our views are correct.
To proceed then: if we intend our citizens to be brave, must we not add to this such lessons as are likely to preserve them most effectually from being afraid of death? Or do you think a man can ever become brave who is haunted by the fear of death?
No, indeed, I do not.
Well, do youimagine that a believer in Hades and its terrors will be free from all fear of death, and in the day of battle will prefer it to defeat and slavery?
Certainly not.
Then apparently we must assume a control over those who undertake to set forth these fables, as well as the others, requesting them not to revile the other world in that unqualified-manner, but rather to speak well of it, because such language is neither true, nor beneficial to men who are intended to be warlike.
We certainly must.
It only remains for us, I proceeded, to inquire how the democratical man is transformed into the tyrannical, and what is the character of the latter after the change, and whether his manner of living is happy or the reverse.
True, this case is still remnaining, he said.
Then do you know, I asked, what I am still desiderating?
What is it?
I think that the number and nature of the appetites has not been satisfactorily defined: and while this deficiency continues, the inquiry upon which we are entering will be wrapped in obscurarity.
It is not too late to supply the deficiency, is it?
Certainly it is not. Observe the peculiarity which I wish to notice in the case before us. It is this. Some of the unnecessary pleasures and appetites are, if I mistake not, unlawful, and these would appear to form m original part of every man, though in the case of some persons, under the correction of the laws and the higher appetites aided by reason, they either wholly disappear, or only a few weak ones remain, while in the case of others they continue strong and merous. And pray, what are the appetites to which you refer?.
I refer to those appetites which bestir themselves in sleep; when, during the slumbers of that other part of the soul, which is rational and tamed and master of the former, the wild animal part, sated with meat or drink, becomes rampant, and pushing sleep away endeavours to set out after the gratification of its own proper character. You know that in such moments there is nothing that it dares not do,
released and delivered as it is from any sense of shame and reflection. It does not shrink from attempting in fancy unholy intercourse with a mother, or with any man or deity or animal whatever; and it does not hesitate to commit the foulest murder, or to indulge itself in the most defiling meats. In one word,there is no limit either to its folly or its audacity.
Well, I continued, I must say that while I am led by a variety of considerations to believe that we were unquestionably right in our plans for organising the state, I feel this convicfon most strongly when I think of our regulations about poetry.
What was the nature of them?
They were to the effect that we ought on no account to admit that branch of poetry which is imitative. And now that the specific parts of file soul have been each separately defined, the conviction that such poetry must be unhesitatingly refused admittance is to my mind even clearer than it was before.
Explain what you mean.
I am quite sure that you will not denounce me to the tragedians,and the whole company of imiative poets, and therefore I do not mmd saying to you that all imitative poetry would seem, to be detrimental to the understanding of those hearers who do not possess the antidote in a knowledge of its real nature.
Pray, what is the purport of yourremarks?
I must speak my mind, although I confess I am checked by a kind of affectionate respect for Homer, of which I have been conscious since I was a child. For of all those beautiful tragic poets he seems to have been the original master and guide. But it would be wrong to honour a man at the expense of truth, and therefore must, as I said, speak out.
By all means do so.
Listen then, or rather reply.
Put your questions.
Can you give me any account of the nature of imitation generally? For I assure you I am at a loss myself to understand its real meaning.
And so you expect me to understand it.
When I had made these remarks I thought we had done with discussing: whereas it seems it was only a prelude. For Glaucon, withthat eminent courage which he displays on all occasions, would not acquiesce in the retreat of Thrasymachus, and began thus: Socrates,do you wish really to convince us that it is on every, account better to be just than to be unjust, or only to seem to have convinced us?
If it were in my power, I replied, I should prefer convincing you really.
Then, he proceeded, you are not doing What you wish. Let me ask you: is there, in your opinion, a class of good things of such a kind that we are glad to possess them, not because we desire their consequences, but simply welcoming them for their own sake? Take for example the feelings of enjoyment and all those pleasures that are harmless, and that are followed by no result in the after time, beyond
simple enjoyment in their possession.
Yes, I certainly think there is a class of this description.
Well, is there another class, do you think, of those which we value both for their own sake and for their results? Such as intelligence, and sight, and health, all of which are welcome, I apprehend, on both accounts.
Yes.
……
我来评论这本书
联系客服 - 加入到博客 - 图书目录 - 关于图书城.COM - 对外合作 - 购书指南 - 可以在线阅读吗?
English Version: BookGadget
图书城.COM © TuShuCheng.com - 京ICP备06069800